Template
for Australian Ranking of ICT Conferences
|
Conference |
Acronym: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Full
name: _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Website: _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ |
|
Proposed
rank |
Tier
1 £ Tier 2 £ Tier 3 £ Tier 4 £ |
|
Area
of research |
|
|
Peer
review process |
Review
of: full
paper £ extended abstract £ short abstract £ Number
of referees for each paper: _ _ _ Review
process: blind £ double blind £ open £ Are
authors invited to write a rejoinder? yes £
no £ Acceptance
rate (if known): _ _ _ |
|
Program
committee |
Comment
on the composition of the committee (e.g. the proportion that are leading
researchers in the field? Are
they from the premier institutions for the field?) |
|
Quality
of papers |
Comment
on the quality of the papers presented (e.g. whether the work presented
shapes the field; whether the quality of papers is uniform or ÔpatchyÕ, etc) |
|
Comparative
assessment |
Name
some other conferences in the field that are: of
similar quality? _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ of
higher quality? _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ of
lower quality? _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ |
|
Ranking |
Within
the field, what number would you rank it? _
_ _ |
|
Participants |
Are
the top researchers in the field core participants? all
£ most £ some £ none £ |
|
Additional
contextual information |
Please
provide any additional information that will assist in a comparative
assessment of the conference |
|
Your
name and institution |
|